Peacock and
Wiseman conducted a new study based on Wagner's low. They studied the public
expenditure from 1891 to 1955 in UK. They found out that Wagner's low is still
valid. According to this hypothesis, the increase in public expenditure doesn't
follow any smooth and continuous trend but the increase in public expenditure
occurred in step like manner. However, the approach of the hypotheses is made
of three separate concepts.
1. Displacement
effect
2.
Inspection effect and
3.
Concentration effect.
1 DISPLACEMENT
EFFECT:-
During the
time of war, the govt. further increases the tax rates and enlarges the tax
structure to generate more funds to meet the increase in the defense
expenditure. After the war the new tax rate or tax structures may remain the
same, as the people get used to them. Therefore the increase in revenue results
in rise in govt. expenditure.
2.
INSPECTION EFFECT:-
In the
situation of kinky movement of public expenditure, the govt's existing revenue
earning falls much short and so this requires a upward revision of revenue
mobilization and a review of the situation is made both by the government and
the tax paying public. Such review is referred to as inspection effect.
3.
CONCENTRATION EFFECT
With the
kinky rise in the public expenditure it is the central government that comes to
fulfill larger and larger state activities leaving lesser responsibilities to
the regional and local public authorities. This has been referred as to
concentration effect of increasing state activities.
In short,
Peacock Wiseman thesis of govt. spending trend is more convincing than Wagner's
hypotheses.
No comments:
Post a Comment